Google says your traffic is fine. Your dashboards say it’s dead. So who’s lying?
Welcome to AI Overviews – Google’s shiny new toy that answers your questions without you needing to click anything. It’s magical for users, disastrous for publishers, and somehow, according to Google, completely harmless.
“Traffic Is Stable,” Says Google. But Whose Traffic?
In their recent blog post, Liz Reid from Google made a bold claim:
Clicks remain relatively stable. In many cases, we’re sending more quality clicks than before.
Sounds lovely, right? But here’s what they didn’t say:
- They shared zero data to back this.
- They didn’t specify whether traffic went to publishers, YouTube, Google Maps, or Reddit threads.
- They dismissed third-party traffic data as unreliable yet refused to publish their own numbers.
Classic PR move: discredit the critics, avoid the audit.
The Missing Clicks: Where Did They Go?
Let’s assume Google is right that total outbound clicks are up. That might even be true if you count:
- Clicking on a YouTube video
- Tapping a Reddit link
- Visiting a Google-owned property
- Navigating between Google Flights, Hotels, Shopping etc.
But for publishers and websites, clicks have vanished. And we have data to prove it.
| Source | Key Finding |
|---|---|
| Ahrefs | Rank-1 CTR drops up to 34.5% when AI Overview is shown |
| BrightEdge | CTR dropped 30%, even as impressions rose 50% |
| Pew Research | Only 8% of sessions with AI Overviews result in any click |
| MailOnline | CTR from Google fell by >50% on both mobile and desktop |
| Amsive Digital | Non-branded CTR dropped by nearly 20% |
So where’s the “higher quality” traffic Google keeps talking about?
“Your Tools Are Wrong” – Google’s Default Excuse
Google’s defense is that third-party tools like SimilarWeb, Ahrefs, and BrightEdge “don’t capture the full picture.”
True. Because Google doesn’t let them.
In fact, AI Mode often strips away referrer information entirely using noreferrer links. That means:
- Publishers can’t track traffic from AI Overviews
- Analytics tools don’t attribute the visits correctly
- Google Search Console doesn’t report AI click data separately
So yes, publishers “don’t see the full picture.” But that’s because Google broke the window.
How the Game Works
Let’s break it down:
| Google’s Claim | The Reality |
|---|---|
| “Clicks are stable or up” | Because you now click on Google’s own content or YouTube links |
| “Click quality is improving” | Because the summary gives you the answer – no need to click |
| “Publishers are still getting traffic” | Only if they’re lucky to be cited, and even that barely matters |
| “3rd-party data is inaccurate” | But Google refuses to show its own data |
This is the zero-click era. Google gets the engagement. You get the leftovers.
The Sidebar: The Great Google Gaslight
Publisher: My traffic dropped by 40%.
Google: That’s because your content wasn’t helpful.
Publisher: But I’m cited in your AI Overview.
Google: That’s a compliment, not a click.
Publisher: Where’s the traffic, then?
Google: [Redacted]
What Google Should Be Sharing (But Won’t)
If Google wants to be taken seriously in this debate, here’s what they owe us:
- Traffic breakdown by destination
- Publisher websites vs. YouTube vs. Google-owned verticals
- AI Overview engagement data
- How many clicks go to cited sites vs. none at all
- CTR changes with/without AI Overviews
- For each industry: News, Health, Education, Travel, Finance
- Session abandonment rates
- Are users bouncing more because AI already answered their query?
Until then, dismissing third-party data is just a corporate version of “don’t ask questions.”
Final Word: This Isn’t Just About Traffic
This is about transparency, trust, and the future of the open web.
If AI is the future, we’re all fine with evolving. But don’t kill the ecosystem that trained your models, steal the audience, and then pretend nothing changed.
Because something did change. Just ask any publisher looking at their analytics chart. Or rather, trying to figure out where the rest of the chart went.
TL;DR
- Google says “clicks are fine” but shares no data.
- Independent data shows massive CTR drops for publishers.
- Google discredits 3rd-party tools but refuses to release its own numbers.
- AI Overviews are eating clicks and hiding the trail.
- This isn’t SEO. It’s survival.
Discover more from Rudra Kasturi
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.